China has imposed strict game time limitations for minors partly out of concern they could develop addictions, but a new paper published in Nature Human Behavior found no evidence that the rules have had any impact on excessive gaming at all.
The researchers partnered with Unity to examine more than 7 billion hours of playtime and around 2.4 billion Chinese gamer profiles from mid-August of 2019 to mid-January of 2020, a span of time that includes the imposition of an hour-and-a-half daily playtime limit for minors, or three hours on holidays.
"Heavy" gaming was defined as an individual playing for four or more hours a day, six or more days per week.
The researchers "found no credible evidence for overall reduction in the prevalence of heavy playtime following the implementation of regulations."
In fact, they found players were slightly more likely to engage in heavy gaming after the regulations went into effect, but the gain was not enough to be considered statistically meaningful.
"The work presented provides a case study for understanding how a government’s policy decisions affect - or do not affect - the lives of real people on a grand scale, and forms a blueprint for future data-led public policy," said the study's lead researcher, Dr. David Zendle of the University of York.
"It is now possible to tractably analyze billions of hours of direct digital behavioral data. This can lead to better and more effective policymaking. Governments, industry stakeholders, and academics should rise to this challenge."
Leon Y. Xiao from the IT University of Copenhagen was one of the co-authors on the paper. Ineffective gaming regulations is something of a theme for Xiao's research, which has previously found China's loot
Read more on gamesindustry.biz