Blood Bowl 3 may have only just been released, but it's already getting a kicking on Steam.
Cyanide Studio's latest instalment comes eight years after Blood Bowl 2, but it seems as though some players don't think it's been worth the wait. Right now, the self-proclaimed «iconic death sport» boasts a «Mostly Negative» aggregate rating on Steam – that's a 73 per cent disapproval rate – amassed from almost 800 players.
«I love Blood Bowl, but this game is a mess,» said one unhappy player.
«Currently a day after release it's buggy as hell — I would not buy until patched, and if previous games are to go by then it's going to be a while before it's patched enough,» added another. «Pick up in a few months when it's 20% off and it's been patched. The UI isn't great either, but it's more that it's poor than „cannot use“ so that's not the main reason for the non-recommendation.»
«I mean, it's Cyanide. I knew it was going to be bad, but I'm a loser and I love me some Blood Bowl,» opined a third. «So I got in with extremely low expectations, figuring the game was going to be ugly, janky and lacking in features, and hope with time it'd become decent or good. But dang, yeah, it was so much worse than I expected.
»Blood Bowl 3 is lazy and greedy. They don't care. I truly believe that," they added. «Do NOT buy this game. I encourage those who did to refund it if it's not too late. Maybe if BB3 dies, we can see an actually passionate company get their hands on the license.»
It's not all bad, though – 27 per cent of players have given it a thumbs up, but even then, the positive reviews often come with caveats, like this one:
«Compared to Blood bowl 2, which I have 600 hours on, game is honestly fine. Usual BB gameplay with updated
Read more on eurogamer.net