Redditors Discuss Why Total War Fans are Playing Rome 2 Instead of Pharaoh - Hardcore Gamer
In the dynamic world of strategy gaming, it’s not uncommon for older titles to reclaim the limelight when the newer ones fail to impress. Such is the case with Rome II and Pharaoh, two Total War titles that have sparked quite a discussion on the gaming community, as evident in this Reddit thread. Let’s delve into the reasons behind this interesting shift, highlighting insights from fellow Redditors.
Redditor u/swagpresident1337 pointed out the pricing disparity between Rome II and Pharaoh. While many gamers are eager to experience the ancient Egyptian world, the price tag on Pharaoh left them hesitant. As u/swagpresident1337 succinctly put it, “It’s boring as hell,” seemingly referring to the high cost.
User twitch870 made an astute observation regarding Pharaoh’s timing, suggesting that its release coincided with other notable gaming events, including Cyberpunk updates, making it a challenging period for a new release. Furthermore, the game received mixed reviews, indicating potential issues affecting its player base. As u/twitch870 pointed out, it may find more success after a price drop and some improvements.
Reddit user GuglielmoTheWalrus made an interesting comparison, likening Pharaoh to Total War: Attila, highlighting that Attila’s broader spectrum of factions and historical depth made it a more enticing choice. Pharaoh’s Bronze Age setting, despite its allure, lacks the diverse factions and epic warfare appeal of other time periods explored in the Total War franchise.
Redditor Maleficent-Spell9025 summed up the situation succinctly, asserting that Rome II still enjoys a stronger player base. As a testament to the enduring appeal of this classic title, it continues to attract strategy gamers.
Reddit user
Read more on hardcoregamer.com
