Players Discuss The Right Amount Of Time To Pass Before A Remake

thegamer.com:

The debate over how soon is too soon to remake a game has been sparking discussion among players in pretty much every corner of each community, most notably since the recent releases of Dead Space and Resident Evil 4. The topic was for example recently raised on Resetera, users on the platform sharing their various opinions on the matter. Some argue that remakes should only be considered after a certain period has passed, while others clearly believe that timing shouldn’t matter, as long as the remake offers a significant improvement over the original.

The conversation began when a user asked “what's the earliest amount of time ‘acceptable’ to remake a game?" The post garnered numerous responses from users who shared their thoughts on this controversial question. Some users made the argument that a game shouldn’t be remade until at least 10 years have passed since the original release. The majority however seem to feel that a shorter timeframe is perfectly fine, at least insofar as the remake features a substantial improvement in terms of graphics, gameplay, and the overall experience.

RELATED: Resident Evil 4 Remake: Complete Guide And Walkthrough

The main point against remakes would be that if they come too soon, the result in the long run could be a lack of innovation in the games industry. Several users noted that game developers should focus on creating new and original content, rather than relying on nostalgia to sell copies. The debate also touched on the issue of “cash grabs” and the potential taking advantage of players through practices like fan service. More than a few people on the platform have expressed concern that companies could release remakes purely for profit, instead of providing players with an