Generative AI in gaming has been a gnarled, thorny subject for the past few years. Recent experiments have raised the hackles of artists and writers alike—though thus far said experiments have mostly proved that it does a bad job of replicating the human touch.
As I mentioned last week, I feel like tech like Ubisoft's «Neo NPCs» target the poor idea of creating a game you can play forever—something no-one really needs, even if the science fiction of the idea is appealing.
Not to mention the looming worry of human creatives—artists, writers, voice actors—losing their livelihoods. It's a shame that the focus of these efforts feels so askew, since there are actually some pretty good use cases for machine learning that could help artists rather than replace them.
World of Warcraft isn't fully buying into the Generative AI goldrush, though—that's according to franchise director John Hight, who drew a similar line in the sand via a conversation with IGN at GDC.
Hight says his mother was an aeronautical engineer and his father was a fine artist, which gives him «appreciation for the creative process, what an artist goes through in their imagination. I think the artists on the team have a fear that the AI will be deployed to take them out of a job—and they certainly don't want their work to be used without their permission, or without credit.»
While he says Blizzard is «still sorting that out. The rights issues, how far we use this technology,» he maintains that «we're not using generative AI within WoW.»
Machine learning, however, is still on the table. In case you're unfamiliar, there's a notable difference between generative AI—machine learning algorithms that are designed to create artwork, voices, and writing—and using machine learning to automate certain processes. It's not as simple as «good AI» and «bad AI», obviously, but the latter slots more uneventfully into the automation tools artists and devs already use. Such algorithms are more similar to, say, a shader
Read more on pcgamer.com