Starfield Player Hits Peak Perfection With Unlimited Resources

screenrant.com:

players struggling to optimize their resources and recipes need to check out this comprehensive guide meticulously put together by a talented fan. It may not be an essential part of the sci-fi RPG, but those who do take the time to learn how outposts can work to their benefit are sure to find a significantly easier experience since they're a fantastic way to generate a passive income. While the game may not do a fantastic job of explaining how the system works, Starborn now have access to an excellent cheat sheet.

Posting on Reddit, user Mattgyvercom shared their chart to craft every food, chem, and drink item in , demonstrating the resources and the optimal paths of production to achieving the desired outcome.

Additionally, they also shared their illustrated guide to «Outpost Logistics» which serves as an excellent guide on how to best utilize the various structures that can be built on planets, exemplifying the types of materials that each one can generate and how they can best be used. The level of detail is impressive and the post should serve as an excellent cheat sheet for new and old players.

Mattgyvercom goes on to explain that they created the guide as a way to illustrate how players can effectively generate an unlimited amount of money by crafting an endless supply of consumables that can be sold at a profit. Every single item mentioned in the post can be created solely with «farmed» materials that can be gained from outposts; no «loot exclusive» items are needed to create any of the included concoctions. To make matters even more straightforward, the creator also specifies which planets work best: Serpentis IV, Serpentis V-D, Groombridge VIII-A, Freya III, and Alpha Andraste III.

While setting up and maintaining outposts in is completely optional, following the methods of Mattgyvercom will undoubtedly make the game significantly easier for players. Many of the craftable items can be purchased in stores around the galaxy but they're surprisingly