Warning! This article contains major spoilers for Scream 6. If you've yet to see the movie, proceed with caution.
While Scream 6 switches Woodsboro for New York City and doesn't feature Neve Campbell's Sidney Prescott, it still embraces certain traditions of the franchise – particularly when it comes to its killer reveal. Now, though, writers Guy Busick and James Vanderbilt have revealed that the twist wasn't actually their original plan.
In a new interview with Entertainment Weekly (opens in new tab), Busick explained that while they always "knew it was going to be a family, a secret family", the duo didn't work out who the mystery murderers should be exactly until the writing process had already begun.
"The motive of the killers in the last film is very intellectual – it's more about an idea about toxic fans feeling that their franchise has fallen on hard times and 'we have to get it back on track,' and they're taking it so far," Busick continued. "But it's very intellectual, it's very esoteric, and we wanted something really primal. It had to be more personal. That's when we found the Richie piece and we were like, 'Oh, that'll be fun, because it ties all the way back into our first movie together and it tells one big story.'"
In Scream 6's blood-soaked conclusion, it is revealed that Detective Bailey (Dermot Mulroney) and his children Quinn (Liana Liberato) and Ethan (Jack Champion) are the killers, hellbent on making Sam pay for killing their son and older brother Richie (Jack Quaid) in the events of Scream 5. As fans have noticed, Bailey's vengeful character is similar to that of Scream 2's Nancy Loomis (Laurie Metcalf), who plotted to kill Sidney for taking out her homicidal son Billy (Skeet Ulrich) in the 1996
Read more on gamesradar.com