Commander Shepard's fate remains a burning question for . BioWare has been silent about Shepard's possible return in the upcoming game, and the ending to left things very ambiguous. This has made many fans question if BioWare is silent because Shepard will return or not, and both sides have great reasons.
Thanks to the possibilities that come with the sequel, BioWare can fix the issues that come from , which seemed to signal the end of the series for many years. Luckily, we're ready for, and there's enough reason to believe this is a fresh start or the return of a beloved gaming icon.
While BioWare has officially dismissed the popular indoctrination theory as a complete explanation for the ending, that doesn't preclude the studio from cherry-picking elements of it for. The theory asserts that the Reapers' control influenced Shepard's final choices and resonates deeply with a significant portion of the fanbase, myself included. By incorporating aspects of indoctrination, the developers could retroactively validate some players' interpretations while adding a layer of psychological complexity to Shepard's survival.
Imagine a scenario where Shepard, believed dead, is actually trapped in a Reaper-induced mental prison. The seemingly conclusive Destroy ending could be recontextualized as Shepard's subconscious fighting off indoctrination, a battle playing out within their mind while their body clings to life. This approach allows BioWare to acknowledge the emotional impact of the theory without completely rewriting established lore.
During an Instagram Live, I asked Mark Meer, Commander Shepard's male voice, what he thought of the Indoctrination Theory. He said he liked it but didn't think it was what BioWare was going for.
Furthermore, the lingering effects of indoctrination could provide a compelling narrative hook for. Shepard, rescued but scarred, might struggle with the psychological aftermath, grappling with fragmented memories of previous games, phantom enemies,
Read more on screenrant.com