Few video game series are as influential and popular as Call of Duty. The annualized franchise throws players into fast-paced battles across various historical time periods — along with fictional eras as well. Call of Duty has taken us to World War II, the Cold War, a modern setting, and even to the future.
Although it’s one of the most successful video game franchises out there, Call of Duty’s quality varies significantly from game to game, with some fantastic entries in the series, but many mediocre ones as well. But which Call of Duty games are worth your time and which ones should you skip? To answer that question, we’ve ranked all the mainline entries in the series, with details about why you should or shouldn’t play a particular game.
Recommended Videos
These are all the Call of Duty games ranked from worst to best.
Related
- You might want to wait a bit to play Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 on Steam
- Is Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 cross-platform?
- The PS5 games with the best graphics
21. Call of Duty 3
71% Platforms Wii, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3, Xbox, Xbox 360 Genre Shooter Developer Treyarch, Exact Entertainment Publisher Activision Release November 07, 2006 <div data-cloudcity="" data-type=«button» data-pid=«j97MpM0txp» data-limit=«1» data-cta_pattern="$%price %merchant" id=«dtcc-j97MpM0txp»> The Xbox 360 saw exponential growth in sales during 2005 thanks to the Call of Duty 2, which remains popular to this day. Unfortunately, Call of Duty 3 did not fare as well as its predecessor. Treyarch released it after a very short development when they took control of the franchise. The game failed to impress, with a less-engaging multiplayer mode stuck between Call of Duty 2’s approach and the Call of Duty 4 formula. The campaign mode attempted to change things up by including a Canadian section and a struggling mechanic for melee combat. Still, it lacked the polish or characters to carry it forward. Call of Duty 3 is the rare Call of Duty game that you are better
Read more on digitaltrends.com