Starfield Runs Better on AMD GPUs Thanks to Architectural Advantages, New in-Depth Analysis Suggests

wccftech.com:

Starfield, the new huge role-playing game developed by Bethesda, generally runs better on AMD GPUs than NVIDIA GPUs thanks to some architectural advantages, as suggested by a new in-depth analysis shared online this week.

ChipsAndCheese took a good look at the game's performance on both manufacturers' current flagship cards, RTX 4090 and RX 7900 XTX, highlighting how AMD's card provides better performance at all resolutions, although the gap gets narrower at higher resolutions. While this sounds strange considering how the RTX 4090 is a more capable GPU than the RX 7900 XTX, as summarized by Reddit user Mikereysalo, ChipsAndCheese highlights how the AMD card is capable of better performance thanks to some architectural advantages, which include having fewer cores with bigger register files, which allow the GPU to track more threads per core, leading to higher occupancy that benefits performance, a higher L2 bandwidth granted by smaller L2 cache, and using wave 64 instead of wave32, which tracks only half the threads as wave32, but with some performance benefits.

As such, it's not that NVIDIA GPUs are underperforming in Starfield's case but that AMD GPUs are overperforming. The full analysis provides plenty of interesting facts on the matter, so make sure to check it out to understand how Bethesda's game takes advantage of the unique architectural features of AMD GPUs.

While performance is definitely an issue for many, Starfield is still a more than worthy role-playing game to get, thanks to an engaging story, huge amount of meaningful content, and solid combat, as I highlighted in my review.

With an engaging story, well-developed characters and lore, and a huge amount of meaningful content, Starfield is one of Bethesda's