Pulp Fiction Ending Explained (In Detail)
Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction is one of the most universally loved films of all time, although the nature of Tarantino's chosen method of storytelling means that its ending is sometimes considered confusing. Pulp Fiction follows two mob hitmen, a boxer, a prominent gangster and his wife, and a number of small-time crooks over a short span of time. The film's story is told through four intertwined tales, all of which concern a valuable stolen briefcase.
Starring Samuel L. Jackson, John Travolta, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Ving Rhames, and Tim Roth, Pulp Fiction's colorful ensemble cast of characters makes for an unforgettable film. Its continued relevance to pop culture and lasting legacy as one of Quentin Tarantino's greatest films speaks for itself, but its story is thoroughly interesting and cleverly woven, making it a classic of the crime genre. Pulp Fiction also boasts a number of truly iconic scenes that have since been imitated and lampooned countless times in various ways.
Related: What Is The Tarantino Effect? How He Changed Hollywood Movies
The inescapable appeal of Pulp Fiction has led to an incredibly passionate contingent among its wider audience. Over the years since its 1994 release, there has been endless debate over the exact meaning of certain scenes, the spinning of various Pulp Fiction fan theories, and thorough analysis of practically every shot in the film. However, due to the non-chronological manner of storytelling that Tarantino opted to take for Pulp Fiction, its ending is sometimes considered relatively confusing. In addition, Tarantino is known for his love of deep and symbolic narrative devices within his movies, meaning that there's far more to Pulp Fiction's ending than meets the eye.
Pul
Read more on screenrant.com
