Trainwreckstv claims he was more logical and coherent with his arguments during recent debate with HasanAbi

sportskeeda.com:

Tyler "Trainwreckstv" claimed during his recent Twitch stream that people perceived him as more logical in his arguments during the viral debate with "HasanAbi" Piker a couple of days ago, and any perception of him as a weaker speaker was due to his being "soft" in his approach.

The two streamers have been beefing over gambling and other topics for months, so fellow Twitch streamer xQc tried to intervene and facilitate a discussion between the two, thinking they could reach common ground. However, the debate got quite heated, with each accusing the other of various things.

In Trainwreckstv's most recent stream on Twitch, he claimed that neutral viewers thought he was more logical than HasanAbi in the discussion, but his drawback was that he was being soft-spoken:

Of course, this assertion is up for debate as the whole discussion, mediated by xQc, took quite a long time, with HasanAbi arguing against Trainwreckstv about gambling streams, undermining the Turkey-Syria earthquake fund, and other things such as the definition of socialism and whether they were being consistent with their individual philosophies.

Redditors of r/LivestreamFail, where the above clip gained quite some traction, had a lot to say about Trainwreckstv's assertion that his points were more logical than his opponent. A few made fun of him while others pointed out that he was in an echo chamber, surrounded by people who were supporting him no matter what. A few even mocked him by writing "Fake News":

The debate itself was hours long and contained many memorable moments. While judging who was the better debater is a matter of perspective, Redditors of r/LivestreamFail clearly did not like Trainwreckstv's assertion about being more logical.

Among the many