Qualcomm Claims Snapdragon X Elite Is Superior To Intel Lunar Lake & AMD Strix, Shows 2nd Gen Oryon CPU Up To 134% Than Core Ultra 200V
Qualcomm has shared new benchmarks of its Snapdragon X Elite & 2nd Gen Oryon CPU, which show far superior performance than Intel & AMD.
Qualcomm's Benchmarks Puts Its Snapdragon X Elite Laptop SoC Ahead of Intel's Lunar Lake & AMD Strix Point, But Inconsistencies Are Present
It looks like Qualcomm has taken a dig at Intel's Core Ultra 200V "Lunar Lake" CPUs, where Team Blue claims that their newest mobile SoCs are faster than ARM-based counterparts.
Related Story Intel & Samsung Are Reportedly Inking A “Foundry Alliance”, Sharing Production Facilities Along With Process Tech
The San Diego chipmaker presented a series of benchmarks, which involved a more extensive comparison of Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite SKUs with Intel's Lunar Lake, and Qualcomm's Director of Engineering Sriram Dixit disclosed that Intel didn't put the Snapdragon platform at "level grounds" when advertising its Lunar Lake benchmarks.
Qualcomm has provided benchmarks stacking up their Snapdragon X1E-84-100 with Intel's mid-tier Core Ultra 7 256V, where the chipmaker claims that they managed to witness a 10% performance gap with Intel's Lunar Lake counterpart in Geekbench single-core testing and with multi-core, this gap increased up to 52%, which is a massive figure. It's important to note that these performance bumps also come with higher power efficiency numbers, so overall, things are solid for Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform.
However, the above testing has some disparities, mainly in the difference in core configurations; Intel's Core Ultra 7 256V is an eight-core chip, while the Snapdragon X1E-84-100 comes with twelve Oryon chip cores onboard. Hence the testing isn't too fair when it comes to the difference in specifications. However, Qualcomm does say that its flagship Snapdragon chip surpasses Intel's flagship counterpart, the Core Ultra 9 288V, in multi-core testing, revealing that they utilized benchmarks from PCWorld to support their claim since they didn't have access to Intel's chip.
At
Read more on wccftech.com
