The release of has some fans of the franchise comparing it to, and finding to their surprise that has a leg up when it comes to villager interactions. The free version of was shut down in November, and the vast world of customization contained within it was almost lost forever right along with it. Instead, Nintendo decided to reintroduce the title as a single-purchase, complete mobile game stripped of its live updates, microtransactions, and most of its social elements. As a result, many fans are only now picking up the game, though it's been out and continuously updating for seven years.
Many fans joining the experience can't help but compare it to Nintendo's last main entry in the franchise,. Reddit user FreddOricarne has started a discussion about this comparison, asking why ""The Redditor believes that the mobile game has better outfits, furniture, and more. Many fans seem to agree with the sentiment, sharing their laments about what they believe could have been, based on what manages to be.
The villagers in sit on the chairs you put out for them, put on little shows on the stages you set up, read books, take soaks in hot tubs, and so much more. It's an element that was sorely missing from, as Reddit user Flooffy_unycorn notes, saying that they thought villagers "" However, most of the objects in can't be interacted with even items that would make sense like lawnmowers that don't mow lawns and teacup rides that sit forever lonely and rider-less.
Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp Complete brings the villagers from the series into one place and lets players to choose who they want to spend time with.
This seems to be the biggest gripe players have with as many comments mention that they wish villagers would actually use more of the items that they set out, the way they do in. Reddit user relentlessdandelion says that this interactivity is a big part of what makes the mobile game feel more alive than the Switch title. "" they say.
Another thing that does well, but
Read more on screenrant.com