Why D&D Characters Shouldn’t Always Be Optimized
Optimizing Dungeons & Dragons characters isn't always best, despite the joy of creating a character that's perfectly crafted to accomplish their role in the party. While everyone loves the incredible abilities that come from expertly combining race and class features, the most successful combinations can become tiresome. Creating a character with obvious flaws, or whose best stat has nothing to do with their abilities, can bring variety, humor, and realism to a D&D campaign.
Creating a D&D character is an exciting and creative undertaking. However, it also requires careful forethought to ensure a character does not face an early end. One of the best ways to make sure a character is well-equipped for the treacherous road ahead is to match the features of their race with the needs of their class. However, frequently using D&D's most overpowered character builds can stifle creativity, become boring, or limit the game's challenge.
Related: Weirdest D&D Feats For Niche Character Builds
Making a D&D character is about more than optimization, it's about balancing authenticity and creativity with feasibility. Sometimes it's best to create a character with deliberate flaws and unexpected strengths. While certain combinations of class and race appear to not make any tactical sense, they offer players the opportunity to stand out. For example, while the Leonin race's strength and constitution boosts make it a perfect fit for Barbarians and Fighters, players might have more fun playing a Leonin bard who chooses to inspire their allies despite their obvious inclination towards fighting. Another unorthodox build could be a Kobold wizard who's determined to learn about magic despite not being suited for magic. These scenarios provide
Read more on screenrant.com
