Strange New Worlds Just Debunked Star Trek’s Oldest Kirk Criticism
With one ambitious, time-bending swing, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds has finally laid the biggest and oldest Captain Kirk criticism to rest. No Star Trek fan could deny the immense impact of James T. Kirk upon Gene Roddenberry's fictional universe, where he earned legend status many times over. Kirk is renowned for his bravery, tactical nous, leadership skills and decision-making, which led to countless first contacts and military victories. Nevertheless, one recurring criticism has dogged Captain Kirk throughout his Starfleet career — an accusation of being a reckless maverick who acts first and asks questions later.
Whether Kirk deserves that reputation has always been questionable. William Shatner's extensive Star Trek: The Original Series captain's log contains more diplomatic and level-headed moment than Kirk often gets credit for. On the other hand, Kirk absolutely is more gung-ho than Starfleet captains such as Jean-Luc Picard, who's often considered the «thinker» between these two Star Trek protagonists. Audience tastes of the 1960s also dictated that Captain Kirk must be an action hero, whereas the evolving nature of sci-fi has allowed successors to grow beyond those confines.
Related: Strange New Worlds Finale Cliffhanger Continues Number One Being Replaced
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds' season 1 finale («A Quality of Mercy» — an alternate version of the 1960s classic «Balance of Terror») finally proves Kirk's overriding criticism was always very wrong. Captain Pike adopts the role of a Kirk critic in this scenario, dismissing the young firebrand as a hothead whose impulses could trigger a bloody, endless war. Pike's skepticism over Kirk directly mirrors how the latter's Enterprise captaincy has been
Read more on screenrant.com
