The Book of Boba Fett and Peacemaker may not have a lot in common on the surface, but the two shows tried to do some similar things with their characters, only Peacemaker did a much better job. While The Book of Boba Fett is the worst-reviewed season of a live-action Star Wars show so far, while Peacemaker is one of the best-reviewed DCTV shows of all time (with way more competition).
The Book of Boba Fett and Peacemaker both feature formerly villainous side characters and send them on a journey to question their morality and role in the universe, and both shows feature a number of major Easter eggs and cameos to their respective shared universes. While Boba Fett as a character has been far more popular than Peacemaker for a long time, Peacemaker's show saw success that made it more in-demand than The Book of Boba Fett, largely due to how much better its storytelling was handled.
Related: Disney Star Wars' Biggest Problem is a Focus on Canon Over Plot
While Boba Fett has had far more exposure over the years since his live-action debut in Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back 1980, Peacemaker has been around in the comics since 1966, although he never enjoyed the same level of popularity as Boba Fett, only reaching mainstream recognition when he appeared in The Suicide Squad in 2021. This put them in a fairly similar place for their respective solo shows, but over the course of their first seasons, Peacemaker managed to do far more.
One of the biggest differences with Peacemaker and The Book of Boba Fett is their focus (or lack thereof) on the character development of their respective leads. The Book of Boba Fett's early episodes give a lot of time to flashbacks of Boba Fett's time with Tusken Raiders, and while that
Read more on screenrant.com