A study has found that drivers can perform simple tasks quicker with buttons, knobs, and other physical controls instead of smartphone-inspired systems that rely on touchscreens.
Swedish car magazine Vi Bilägare(Opens in a new window) had drivers perform four actions—reset the trip odometer; "activate the heated seat, increase temperature by two degrees, and start the defroster"; turn on the radio and tune it to a specific channel; and "lower the instrument lighting to the lowest level and turn off the center display"—on 12 cars while the vehicle was moving at 68 mph (110 km/h).
The magazine says 11 of those cars featured touchscreen-based control systems; one was equipped with more traditional controls. (Drivers were able to familiarize themselves with each system before the experiment, Vi Bilägare says, to make the comparison more fair.) Each system's performance was then judged based on how long it took drivers to complete the specified tasks.
Vi Bilägare says drivers performed the best with more traditional controls, and for the most part, it wasn't even close. Drivers were able to complete all four tasks in 10 seconds flat with the Volvo V70's physical controls. Only the Dacia Sandero (13.5s), Volvo C40 (13.7), and Subaru Outback (19.4s) came within 10 seconds of the V70. The others came in between 20.2 and 44.9 seconds.
That means the vehicles traveled as far as 0.85 miles before drivers completed all four tasks.
These findings don't measure other problems with touchscreen-based controls. Vi Bilägare notes that some of the systems don't feature backlighting for certain functions, such as climate controls, which makes them difficult to use at night. Others rely on large screens that force drivers to look further
Read more on pcmag.com