Call of Duty: Warzone Fan Shares Side-By-Side Comparison That Highlights Caldera’s Issues

gamerant.com:

Call of Duty: Warzone Pacific has not been the breath of fresh air that many were hoping for. While Caldera is certainly different from Verdansk, many Call of Duty: Warzone players do not believe the map is different in a good way, with one Redditor sharing a side-by-side comparison that highlights Caldera’s weaknesses.

The problems highlighted by the map comparison are a lack of points of interest in Caldera and a startling amount of empty space. Plenty has been said about the lack of named locations in Caldera, with a fan recently coming up with their own points of interest that would make the battle royale map livelier. For comparison, Verdansk had 22 named areas for players to land at, loot, and fight in. Caldera only has 15 unique, named areas, limiting the variety of places that gamers can land at.

Dr Disrespect Has Interesting Idea to Separate Warzone Players Based on Inputs

While the lack of points of interest is certainly a contributing factor when it comes to the community’s disappointment in Caldera, the other issue is the map’s empty space. This is what the side-by-side comparison from Reddit user and Call of Duty: Warzone fan juwong_ homes in on. In the edited image, empty space is highlighted in red, and one glance should instantly make it clear just how different Caldera and Verdansk are in terms of their designs.

When it comes to Verdansk, the red space is not only limited, but it is kept to the outskirts of the map. The entire center of the play space is filled with places to go and explore, with the empty areas found in places that gamers would likely never want to go. While the Redditor does leave some empty space on Verdansk untouched, there is still a major difference between the maps. Caldera, on the