Succession writer says she's considering a return to games because they're ‘genuinely, massively exciting in a way that other forms aren't'

pcgamer.com:

There should be a Succession game. I mean, I guess there is, it's called Crusader Kings 3, and it also revolves around failson cabals plotting to usurp their parent's throne, but there should be an actual Succession game. That's my main takeaway from a recent interview with TV writer Lucy Prebble, who has writing credits on everything from Succession, to I Hate Suzie, to Destiny 1. All pretty much the same thing.

In a chat with the BBC's Hardtalk, amid various questions about Prebble's work in TV and theatre, the writer was asked—by slightly bemused host Stephen Sackur—about her long standing passion for video games. Prebble was right in there, telling Sackur that she grew up playing games and that, for all her recent work on stage and screen, games «are doing things that are genuinely, massively exciting in a way that other forms just aren't. They aren't moving».

Prebble went on to say that, while plenty of games were a little staid and predictable in terms of their plots, that was hardly an issue unique to games writing in particular. «I don't think [predictability is] completely confined to gaming,» said Prebble, noting that if you play «the very independent, maybe even what you'd call 'artier' games that are available», you're likely to encounter less predictable, more interesting, and more boldly experimental styles of storytelling.

«Don't get me wrong,» said Prebble, «the big, what they call AAA games, the ones that you kind of think of, do have a kind of slightly banal insistence on a particular kind of violence and a particular kind of obstacle-overcoming.» But then, «you would say that about Hollywood as well.»

Sounds about right to me. Maybe the true sign of games' maturity as a medium is that they've become a