Laptop vs. Desktop GeForce RTX 4090: How Much Do Nvidia's Top GPUs Differ in Performance?
Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 40 Series graphics processors, built on the "Ada Lovelace" architecture, are extremely impressive (and, at the top end, expensive) performers on both desktops and laptops. The top dog in the stack, the GeForce RTX 4090, delivers chart-topping frame rates and is more efficient at advanced ray-traced lighting and image-sharpening DLSS than any before it. You can read both our laptop GeForce RTX 4090 testing analysis and our Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 desktop graphics card review for context versus other GPUs in their respective spheres.
They share a name, but are they really anything like the same thing? How close are the desktop and laptop versions of the RTX 4090 GPU to one another, exactly? The gap between Nvidia’s full-fat and mobile GPUs of the same name has varied through the years, but across virtually all generations, it’s safe to say that desktop graphics cards always have had a distinct advantage. They are much larger, are actively cooled, are situated inside a desktop case with much more thermal headroom than a laptop chassis, and run at higher wattages. Laptop GPU performance and cooling technology have come a long way, but in the end, you can’t defy thermodynamics.
These clear, fundamental differences don’t change the fact that both are based on the same architecture, and sold under the RTX 4090 name, though. It’s easy for consumers to make assumptions about how performance translates between form factors or, for the less tech savvy, to simply overlook even the above factors and make assumptions based on the name alone.
We don’t usually put our laptop and desktop systems through the same exact benchmark tests, or pit them against each other in one chart—shoppers are generally looking to
Read more on pcmag.com
