The UK's Advertising Standards Authority has upheld two claims against Hutch Games for violating loot box disclosure rules.
The regulator found that ads for F1 Clash: Car Racing Manager on the App Store and Rebel Racing on Google Play were misleading because they neglected to include mention of paid loot boxes in the game.
Hutch argued that because players could progress through the game without spending money, such disclosure was unnecessary. It pointed to guidance from the ASA's sister organization the Committee of Advertising Practices that said such an arrangement would put in-game storefronts outside the scope of advertising standards.
However, the ASA pointed to CAP guidance specifically saying product listings on App Stores do count because they are "material to consumers' decision to purchase or download a game, particularly to those with specific vulnerabilities."
The ASA's only action against Hutch was to say they must make clear when their games contain paid loot boxes.
The ads were brought to the ASA's attention by loot box researcher Leon Xiao, whose work has in the past highlighted mandatory loot box labels being inconsistently applied in markets around the world.
Xiao told GamesIndustry.biz he was happy with the outcome, but added that complaining to the ASA on a case-by-case basis is not a solution for a widespread problem.
"On both Google and Apple platforms, many games with loot boxes (thousands, if not tens of thousands) are operated by non-UK-based companies that the ASA cannot act directly against, so we cannot force those companies to comply," Xiao said.
"I will try to get other EU regulators to act, but there is little that can be done in relation to Israeli and Chinese companies in
Read more on gamesindustry.biz