The Captain America: New World Order Controversies, Explained
Captain America: New World Order will be the fourth solo outing for the super-soldier and the first with Anthony Mackie taking on the role officially. Unfortunately, the limited details about the film that have made it to the public eye have been very poorly received for some extremely unpleasant reasons.
Marvel has dealt with some controversy in the past, usually running afoul of some unfortunate implications for a screenwriting choice. Disney, as a company, has been unreasonably cruel to its employees and hired teams in the past. The cultural cache of the company has only gone downhill over the years, and things keep getting worse.
Anthony Mackie's Captain America 4 Gets Official Title And Release Date
Captain America: New World Order borrows a somewhat common phrase for its subtitle. Some might identify it most with the classic WWE stable that ruled the 90s and early 2000s, but it has a much more unsavory history. The term «new world order» was first commonly used by world leaders like Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill to refer to a shift in the balance of power after World War II. Ostensibly earnest efforts to do good through organizations like the League of Nations and eventually the UN were seen by some as tyranny. Sci-fi icon H. G. Wells went on to redefine the term as a dictatorial state of technocratic dominance, leading to a wide-reaching conspiracy movement.
Modern usage of the new world order exists almost exclusively in the mouths of deluded monsters like Alex Jones. Conspiracy theorists have long held that any effort of any government to provide aid to its citizens are tendrils in a larger plot to install a one-world government and destroy freedom for all humanity. This theory is almost always rabidly
Read more on gamerant.com
