Crusader Kings III: Console Edition

metacritic.com:

As someone who has played EUIV quite a lot, CK3 seems like an over-complicated game that's much less fun to play. The controls on PS5 areAs someone who has played EUIV quite a lot, CK3 seems like an over-complicated game that's much less fun to play. The controls on PS5 are really slow.

For instance, you need to hold L3 for like 2-3s to use an in-game cursor, or you need to hold R2/L2 for 2s to open up radial menus. Those actions are used quite often and the gameplay isn't as enjoyable as on PC. The game is stable so far, with no crashes and no bugs noticed, yet.

The trophies are well-picked and for someone who likes challenges, they sure got them with CK3 on PS5. The tutorial explains most of the game mechanics which is recommended for most of the players, even those who had experience with other grand-strategy games from Paradox. I wouldn't recommend buying this game.

Save 50$. It's just not worth it.man, the "game journalists" sure had their copy-pastes ready to go. Did any of them really play the game? it goes further than "inferiorman, the "game journalists" sure had their copy-pastes ready to go.

Did any of them really play the game? it goes further than "inferior controls and graphics" (for the controls it's the most obvious statement ever and for the graphics it's simple untrue) What's more Important here is the ps5 version is straight up missing content, can't modify a CoA, can't even create a custom ruler! Not even talking about mods, (which are obviously missing as well and a big reason why people play on pc) this is supposed to be base game stuff. Other content was carved out to try to sell you the 35€ season pass, of course, some of which has been out for over a year on pc. As someone who played over 1k